If the events that took place during the recent Richmond City Council meeting are a reflection of the overall sentiment in the city, it is possible that the upcoming referendum on the potential Richmond casino might not achieve its intended outcome. The level of support for the casino plans, at the very least, does not appear to be overwhelmingly evident.
November’s vote could be influenced by the council’s newly commissioned study on the proposed facility site, as well as the prevailing negative sentiment expressed towards it.
Added scrutiny for the Richmond casino proposal
The groundwork for a future casino on Richmond’s south side is well underway, with various elements already firmly established. Among these is a designated site for the anticipated $350 million gaming and hotel complex.
The Pamunkey Tribe intends to build the facility on Commerce Road, positioned slightly south of Ingram Avenue. In addition to the casino and hotel, the plans also allocate an industrial mixed-use district along Commerce Road.
City Councilwoman Ellen Robertson, who represents both areas, has been actively involved in addressing this matter. Her recent efforts include successfully incorporating the proposals into the city’s Richmond 300 project.
The Richmond 300 project encompasses the comprehensive development of the entire south side of Richmond. By incorporating the casino proposal into this initiative, it undergoes the same public comment period as every other aspect of the Richmond 300 program. This ensures that the project’s impact on the city is thoroughly discussed and evaluated.
However, Robertson did not stop at that. She further urged the council to commission a study focused on the potential consequences of renovating the exact location where the Pamunkey tribe intends to construct the casino. The remaining members of the council agreed to her request.
The impact of either motion on the tribe’s development is uncertain, and at the moment, it is not a primary concern. The tribe cannot proceed with their plans until the city’s voters approve it through a ballot box decision.
Pessimistic neighbors for the proposed casino
During the latest city council meeting, Robertson expressed concerns raised by her constituents. Additionally, residents residing in her district vocalized apprehensions specifically related to the casino proposals.
The comments had a negative tone as residents expressed concerns about the surge in traffic and expressed their preference for the area’s revitalization to focus on alternative purposes, such as the inclusion of grocery stores.
Although these voices may not be able to convince city council members, they will have the opportunity to make themselves heard in November. In Richmond, along with four other cities in Virginia, voters will have the power to decide whether casinos should be permitted in their local areas.
If the referendum fails, the plans of the Pamunkey Tribe would be completely wasted, particularly in Richmond. So far, there have been no significant efforts to educate voters against the referendum.
If the sentiments expressed by a small number of individuals at the council meeting gain momentum, it could pose challenges for those who are in favor of a Richmond casino. It is crucial to emphasize that the voting process will extend beyond the directly impacted regions and include the entire city.
The Pamunkey Tribe and other proponents of the casino project might find stronger support in other areas of the city. Nevertheless, residents in the immediate vicinity seem unsure or resistant towards the proposal.
Related Articles
